Homegrown Terrorism is A Real Threat and We Must Confront It

we talking about this on on the couch for quite some time senator but I want to ask you to the social media companies over two hundred that he decided and

did they have a greater responsibility to work with the fed to track you know track down these terrorists an

attack homegrown terror Yummy part of it is they've actually designed these applications to be encrypted so what's happened for example marketed to something that it's

not just the FBI for purposes of terrorism law enforcement agencies cannot hunting so this is commercially available things that are now available for you to communicate with people and cryptid in a way that even law enforcement they want to go back because of a crime not just the terrorist

spying most of it is exaggerated inaccurate but it's led to people moving in this direction but this threat this fundamental threat that

you just did a report on one is so different from the threat or use the and we still face that threat to which is that someone from abroad would come here and conduct an attack these

are individuals that never leaving you after being radicalized online and inspired not directed that inspired to take action and

the environment today what other things we saw with the suspect they shot %HESITATION Osama Rahim is he

was married to a young woman they belong she was convert to Muslim they belong to a local mall they left that mosque reportedly on

the of the Boston globe because they felt it was too liberal he then began sort of I terrorism prophesies in online and

not in the dark space right are we able to move on that well ultimately the volume of it and that's what the director

there was saying or that individual I was speaking from the FBI was testifying to Congress on and that is just the sheer volume of it makes it very difficult in some instances the

track at all beyond that it's a reminder that you have individuals out there that are being radicalized at

the take action it would not no one called him and said apparently and said you know do this in Boston they decided that was the natural course and

just as the point of talking years you're saying that a lot of other people who feel the government has too much access to information is exaggerated

what do you mean because I actually I actually do feel like they have to much access and I can understand why people and I know how to things

I would like I don't want them which is that wrong for Americans to feel like the government has been too intrusive but first I would say that the

private sector as much more information in the government does the commercial and information available to every single one of what

channels we watch what magazines you subscribe to what we like to buy we use our credit cards all of the stuff is monetized it is packaged and sold for

purposes of marketing so people don't know that that's true second there is no instance and talking about the two fifteen program which is the bulk collection of your phone record %HESITATION

people don't realize that the those companies that hold other personal there's no documented abuse of that program not and if there is that person should be prosecuted

and put in jail number two the only thing they're gathering our anonymous phone records they're not looking at it in order for them to look at it they have to go to a court and

show probable cause in the reason why that's important for example the instance of that individual who else is he talking to because they're probably part of this play the

second point him the third point people don't realize if your local police department watch yourself on rec they don't even have to go to the court they

can just issue a law enforcement subpoena need access to those records and what I hear I don't I don't know about you know league