I believe this commander in chief and all future commander-in-chief's are unique in our constitution and

of the commander in chief to protect us all should not be construed as an authority to

wrote the constitution ignored the constitution and purported to tear down the marriage laws adopted

not only lawful under the authorization to use military force is within their hair authority

two decades defending the US constitution under the constitution there are two ways to make binding law number

funded plan very pro life legislation been a leader in that one of the interesting laws that you passed in Wisconsin was the ultrasound law and

you agree with me %HESITATION sector that the inherent authority of the president's commander in chief would

is the same person the commander in chief whoever he or she may be in the future that we give the authority to

legislative branch the court should be nearly upholding the law under the constitution and I sat

toilet seats and our light bulbs an article all six of the constitution provides that the constitution shall be the supreme law of the land there

job of the commander in chief is to lay the objective out and then you rely upon the generals and admirals and commanders to

decades fighting to defend the constitution and under the constitution marriage has always been a question for

are for abortion were the ones that are with the mainstream on this issue on and on everything else on foreign policy domestic policy you

ability to make binding in law in the United States of America under under our constitution we talked about it a minute ago there

binding law foreign law is not binding in our country the only binding law is you S. law and the constitution because

a constitutional democracy we need to know what our commander in chief was doing a time of great crisis in this white house has been stonewalling the Congress and