in that case our Supreme Court said the and as an enemy combatant stay and %HESITATION

and captured an act rain or like in World War two we can now one of our own war you have to deal an American collaborating

of our nation they can be held captured in treated as an enemy combatant they have committed a %HESITATION

the history of our military conflicts we've had a viable jail to hold enemy combatants this

case went to the Supreme Court before the death penalty was imposed in this court said yes when

that would be the proper way to do that as to an enemy combatant termination every person designated as an enemy combatant under our system has

handy captured in Afghanistan who was %HESITATION held under the law work for years and

that an enemy combatant traditionally is been held and tried by the military and

the absence of such evidence I know of no legal basis for his detention as an enemy combatant the hold the suspect as an enemy combatant under these circumstances would be contrary to our laws and

the enemy is trying to attack us here in our own backyard if we don't treat this as a war more

we can blow you up with a drone overseas we can capturing Afghanistan put you hold

now we're down to this if you don't hold him as an enemy combatant where you can question him without a lawyer our

you deny the ability that the law of war grant she's a homeless person as an enemy combatant together intelligence because

you joined the enemy even as an American citizen or that year when you join the enemy even

be held as an enemy combatant for intelligence gathering purposes I have been firm against torture but

want people like him to go to Guantanamo bay to be interrogated as an enemy combatant and