Assad is now are launching a massive military offensive add to crush isis and the anti Assad rebels my

but but they see the utter depravity and barbarity of isis and so bombing Assad pry isn't good policy he's

aside and you you might as well be on the sides and so he wants to eliminate any non isis alternative to Assad so

the point is once he can destroy all the non non isis rebel then the arguments of the world will be look the only people left in Syria is either isis or

Syrians not only from ISIS but also from Assad. Fourth, we and our partners should

Assad what does that what does that mean this is part of americana and strategy on the part of who and what he's saying is I'm story

he does the same thing on amnesty does the same thing on Planned Parenthood he does the same thing on this catastrophic Iranian deal and

a crisis is where should he is the danger candy if the buildings people perceived is the

then the threats from abroad see in Iraq and Syria isis isis is the face they

tell the world that he is going to lead the anti isis coalition what would you know about well first of all we would leave it I

but it's dangerous and it is a threat to us a wit and when does the U. S. stepped back it is a threat to us it

does not define the strategy of the coalition with respect to does the body is one community and it's a tragedy of what is happening we

to be he is opposed to some Israeli policies but he certainly not anti Israeli is not anti semitic and

defeated and Assad is gone. It is a tough, complicated, diplomatic, and military

support the anti Assad rebels or do you think puking his right and we should let him take the lead I

of all only isis is responsible for the terrorism only isis is responsible for the depravity but