I'm talking about this is an intelligence gathering national security exercise to protect us against future attacks driven by

future attacks against our nation DDT qualify for enemy you don't know where this

of those tools is the ability to question people about future attacks to gather intelligence for national security purposes without

the law of armed conflict when you're trying to gather intelligence about future attacks against your nation there

this suspect without a lawyer present to gather intelligence about a future attack is

the law of war were trying to protect the nation intelligence gathering as a national security endeavor prosecuting

this is why we need a national security legal system focus on gathering intelligence we have turned over the intelligence gathering system the

if we limit ourselves to gathering intelligence to the criminal justice system and not use the national security system I'm talking about guess

grandchildren exercise a hormone to keep us safer out there and I believe our national security intelligence agencies need

were also trying to prevent a future attack when you're gathering intelligence you don't use the evidence against the defendant used

intelligence about future attacks it may come our way and none of the information can be used against him in

ability to interrogate the suspect for intelligence gathering purposes about future attacks that we may face nine

a lawyer together intelligence to prevent a future attack rather than having to do yeah shake through

for military commissions a first year law student could convict this person what I'm worried about is what does he know about future attacks he's telling us that his brother was the bad guy he

about critics raising concerns about US national security in the wake of those attacks was ncrowd

did we know about it why did we stop and the answer can't be because we dismantle our intelligence gathering you mentioned this and