but guns and a bring them back which is why you could make that against federal law crossing state lines with certain types of weapons and I would object to that on

one of the very least extend that to a federal law governance at state state %HESITATION of

argued that you could not gaze on the image of a cross on federal lands and the federal District

to fight the United States and warned that there would be more nine eleven type attacks

the United States and I've introduced legislation that would strip with federal courts of jurisdiction over

the federal government to do its job and the job of the federal government is to enforce the immigration laws that we have make

the federal government to supersede the state law probably better governance enforce federal money that you would enforce the law that right now the house looks as Colorado you can make an argument Colorado washes their doing

tax why would be against that now that I be against that I would be against this agenda that as I said fundamentally and in my opinion and

allow states to choose whether or not they follow certain parts of the federal health care law well

skyrocket to three hundred twenty thousand dollars with a new federal health care why why should I and

majority of the justices violated federal law rewrote obamacare in order to force that failed law on

federal government is completely failed to enforce federal immigration law much less make stronger and more sex we

down the marriage laws of all fifty states that is long lesson right now that is the law of the land Ken

go through federal government approval before engaging in that private transaction that's the current state of the law and

an organ and why I believe the federal government unless forced federal law review thanks to thanks thank you did

he said it should not be against the law and not have your papers would you agree with that I thought it was inevitable something like this would happen not