bin laden's son in law was put right into the criminal system we have under a law the right to gather intelligence under

this suspect without a lawyer present to gather intelligence about a future attack is

what no lawyer in their right mind will allow I need to talk to their client unless you promise not

establish a reporter in together intelligence without his lawyer being present one so I

makes us stronger not weaker we have the ability under the law for to gather intelligence and

to limit our ability to gather intelligence to the criminal justice system because in essence you've turned over the intelligence gathering process to

if we limit ourselves to gathering intelligence to the criminal justice system and not use the national security system I'm talking about guess

this is why we need a national security legal system focus on gathering intelligence we have turned over the intelligence gathering system the

the criminal justice system where his lawyer controls the conversation absolutely do you really want to turn over intelligence gathering to the terrorist and his lawyer and

the criminal justice system where his lawyer controls the conversation absolutely do you really want to turn over intelligence gathering to the terrorist and his lawyer and

gather intelligence if we have to clear the questions are that we're going to ask to gather intelligence through

now we're down to this if you don't hold him as an enemy combatant where you can question him without a lawyer our

part from the criminal justice system to protect the rest of us we've been doing that for a decade so in other words you want to hold them for thirty days debrief him anything he says during the debriefing anyone have a lawyer present as

criminal law the purpose %HESITATION is to convict somebody for a crime under criminal law domestic criminal law you cannot hold someone for interrogation purposes you

criminal defense lawyers in the accused we have been using enemy combatant information to fight the war on terror for a decade we

the a national security legal system not the criminal justice legal system the New York times editorial board in part says Mister Graham's reckless statement makes