not for protectionism but i am for american is if we're going to have a trade agreement enforce the trade agreement on both sides of the deal change

which trade agreements are approved by Congress I didn't how trade agreements have been done for

will dislocate even more Americans from their job we have an enforced both sides of the trade agreements we have %HESITATION

process that allows free trade agreements to be negotiated not the specific agreement TPP I

agreements the trade agreements are horrible their one sided the other cut and I'm not just talking about those three because I'm

the executive in free trade agreements and if the executive follows those objectives then when the trade agreement goes to Congress it

trade agreements have been pushed by corporate America all for one very simple reason and

the Senate has voted honesty PA the process for free trade agreements not TPP

S. laws now you mentioned we had free trade agreements in the past the way free trade agreements have worked in the past is

approving free trade agreements not specific agreement have been voted on yet TPP which a lot of people have concerns about including me I

one the trade agreements themselves have because those millions of decent paying job since

as I made clear yesterday and it's important for people around the world to understand is that this is a deal with the Obama administration it is not a trade and

is one specific trade agreement that's currently being negotiated TPP stands for the transpacific partnership I

it is simply false that the TPP a trade agreement gives up our

we need to stop entering into bad trade deals I'm for trade and I'm for good trade deals but I'm against bad trade deals like the trans Pacific partnership we

what he is saying is not accurate that is not accurate on this trade agreement well at