instead he used as an excuse to try to come after the second amendment rights of law abiding citizens not

he tried to use it as an excuse to go after the second amendment rights of law abiding citizens and everyone in Washington said it

federal government background check before engaging in a purely private transaction with another private citizen to law abiding citizen now

make it harder for law abiding people that will never happen when I the United

we've seen without burdening law abiding citizens we ensure the second amendment is protected while

try to come after the second amendment rights of law abiding citizens not going to tell you in the weeks and months that followed sandy hook if

Americans of law abiding Americans to possess firearms via the second amendment which is a constitutional right no

licensed firearm dealer who sells at a gun show has to have a background check it it's a requirement that applies to

should come down on them like a ton of bricks but instead he chose to target the second amendment rights of law abiding citizen and

current state of the law is those background checks are in place when a licensed firearm dealer sells %HESITATION

law abiding citizens instead if the objective is not to create a register if the objective is to stop violent crime there's

will infringe on the second amendment rights of law abiding citizens and so what we need to look for is a compromise that actually accomplishes that the

to enroll people into a background check system who have been found a danger to themselves and others back competent court at

to a proposal that has broad support for universal background checks and I would say this to my friend Ted if

been a law abiding citizen should have a right to own and bear guns commonly held in

comprehensive %HESITATION gun control universe so background checks he'd like to pursue a ban on high capacity magazines