gather intelligence if we have to clear the questions are that we're going to ask to gather intelligence through

to limit our ability to gather intelligence to the criminal justice system because in essence you've turned over the intelligence gathering process to

know the difference between prosecuting crime in trying to prevent a future attack the ability to have access to

evidence right now to me is ample and overwhelming to suggest that the attacks in Boston were

absolutely essential to our national security if over time the evidence suggest after

in harmony and our law I would urge the Obama administration to use both systems dnmt

been people come up on the watch list point to make that made the the basis to take someone second amendment rights away what

at war nquire going to be at war for a very long time and we have to have the tools to defend ourselves within our values one

name is premature and is unfair to those who are trying to protect us I don't know how in the world we can make that decision how

of those tools is the ability to question people about future attacks to gather intelligence for national security purposes without

last thing in the world I want to do is turn intelligence gathering over to the terror suspect in their lawyer I

will be used to protect us and the last thing in the world we should do in the times in which we live is

Iran has the bomb Saudi Arabia is going to get the Egyptians are going to get the Emirati is are going to get it the Jordanians are going to want to because

these folks in a bomb administration or up to no good that I don't buy the idea that the Chinese are the people in Hong Kong that

the people of Boston you make us proud by the courage you've shown to the law enforcement until %HESITATION

the second Republican debate you accurately predicted weeks before rush Russia's Putin was going to bomb people