we also have to policies that are good for our cause here's the bottom line a lot of what these people are advocating for what distro hurt our economy battle for

so the bottom line is as a policymaker we must balance our interest for the ecology which is legitimate with

I think have a balance for a nuanced approach as far as protecting the individual's right to privacy let

have protected without a president argue

had protection on we have child safety protection for Guangdong's in that legislation and

general election is that a problem for the well as policy makers are job is to no doubt have policies that are good for our natural environment but

if you're a single mom in Tampa Florida and you're electric bill goes up by thirty dollars a month that is catastrophic and

it's a disaster and we have to protect Israel

that would have killed cops who had protection on we had a child safety protection forgotten

protected serenity we must protect the borders second we must fix the legal immigration system we have sixteen plus separate visa programs today we

our interest for the economy and the bottom line is that American energy will allow millions of people to improve their standard of living just the way it's erotic and poverty for millions of people around the world

not have a car for rape and incest is also something that seems very backward looking in terms of the cultural mores that we have today

also it making sure we balance good decision parents bought the need to protect would generally protect our natural resource with

if you have an environment a government that does its essential functions protects our rights and then stays out of the way that's

example tomorrow there will be a new carbon rule issued by the EPA and here's the practical impact of do that new

also a writer nnj later even though we have but or