of acts it's unconstitutional it contravenes the Fourth Amendment which says you have a right to privacy the

the buyers is that something that you would filibuster %HESITATION well I would have an alternative to it I think what

would require that freedom be protected against discriminatory barriers it would require states to assure that all

now joined it in that filibuster threat %HESITATION what do you make of it would you join it well I'd like to have an open process the only way I would a filibuster a bill is that senator Reid did not allow alternative

the defense of this institution if the defense of the legislative branch of the defense of the fed it's a defense of

day of defense of the the separation of powers and of the checks and balance and Mister president the star would yield %HESITATION

Earth, and if we start acting like it, we will be it. It's that simple.

commitment to equality should not be controversial in America or if it is then

your reaction all of this is just part and parcel of a presidential politics we should expect now now it is it

would your plan be to stop this growing cancer of evil connects really what it is first

of the re one of the things that the Senate has at its disposal to preserve and protect its price the aft important questions of this time are

a system a fair and proportional representation of all of us would replace it nnj

But if you reversed it, it would be a burst of

been guilty of perpetrating and so what the second part of this would do would be to end that gerrymandering and

part of the Associated plans it's also part of the benefit that would be available to individuals includes meaningful tort

kind of cutting back on entitlement programs and that's that's the bottom line here and to do it now what