less intervention like rand Paul almost evenly split there is a think of the Republican Party who thinks that we should think before

do I think too often there've been instances where the Republican Party has allowed itself to be pictured as the party of big business party

who often in our country and I think both sides bear responsibility for

think we understand the future the military is a military with both men and women in leadership senator Gramm I

believe in peace through strength I think it interventions not always the answer and that some interventions lead to unintended consequences so

unfortunately that is the approach with president Obama on every issue it is that he seeks Terrassa party seeks to politicize and

is always the party the party the party both sides Democrats Republic and %HESITATION %HESITATION I'd met him before and

the lobbyists are writing checks on both sides and and it's not true party it's one party the party of Washington and

through both political parties quite for how to put this country on an unsustainable path I think that's been exacerbated over the last eighteen both

think now he wants is seeking and according the Democratic Party to get their

me close by recognizing that there is a movement afoot in both parties the disengage the United States from issues throughout

responded appropriately I think not not one DOD asset reach these people before they were evacuated for

let them did you do business as normal %HESITATION that would really I think staying staying put how serious is this military intervention

pricing is interesting is that Marco Rubio has managed come through both of these debates without doing any

they too can cross red lines without fear that is why those who argue that what happens in Syria is not of our business are

is career politicians in both parties who get in bed with lobbyists and special interest and