should go in with overwhelming force and then we should get the heck out because people are tired of

should go in with overwhelming force and then we should get the heck out I'm in the best position to do that to

should begin with a clearly defined objective we should go in with overwhelming force and then we should get the heck out opinion about it then

should begin with a clearly defined objective we should go in with overwhelming force and then we should get the heck out we should begin with a clearly defined objective we

should be with a clearly defined objective it should be with overwhelming force and then we should get the heck out if it

should go in with overwhelming force and then we should get the heck out little girls our daughters Katherine in Carolina four and seven you

other Republicans I I do not believe we should engage in personal attacks that we should I

have never supported the use of military force of U. S. military force in this conflict and I still don't I

haven't been one of them I think the touchstone of U. S. military policy should be protecting the national security of

at the same time any U. S. military force we have always been exceedingly reluctant to engage in military forces worth remembering biggest

not engaging in deception that's what the Senate should be doing and frankly a

should use overwhelming force for a clearly stated objective and then we're done we should get the heck out you ask where I differ with George W. bush I

that I think does not reflect the realities of the strong U. S. national security interest in

and and that is not furthering U. S. interest now you ask bill what should we be doing we should stop engaging in the fiction of trying to find these moderate rebels and support them we

we appealed it to the U. S. court of appeals I personally argued the case before the U. S. court of appeals and

principles that should govern U. S. foreign policy and military action the touchstone should always be the vital US national security interest that's