have to ensure that the laws of people are putting out there do not infringe on the rights of of law abiding citizens and

we've seen without burdening law abiding citizens we ensure the second amendment is protected while

law abiding citizens instead if the objective is not to create a register if the objective is to stop violent crime there's

if you pass a law that makes it hard to do that law abiding people will not have guns criminals there will at

firearms the federal government keeping a list of every firearm that is lawfully owned by every law abiding citizen would

constitutional rights of law abiding citizen they weren't interested in doing anything to go after real

the most sensible in terms of balancing of the rights of law abiding citizens and

it is putting this massive new burden on law abiding citizens whom the data show are not posing any significant threat nndb

the net result is you're going to take away rights of of law abiding citizens the ninety nine point nine nine nine percent of the people that are law

burden the paperwork the cost and federal government oversight the private transactions between law abiding citizen that

American's phone records I believe your phone records are yours I say the phone records of law abiding citizens are

instead he used as an excuse to try to come after the second amendment rights of law abiding citizens not

make it harder for law abiding people that will never happen when I the United

the consequence of doing that nnj is on multiple levels number one it increases the burden on law abiding citizens to

the murderers in the robust and the robbers but it's a terrible thing for the law abiding citizen you

I you know and %HESITATION I just think the law abiding citizens have that right you think its constitution as I do what