we appealed it to the U. S. court of appeals I personally argued the case before the U. S. court of appeals and

also because we need strong industries in order to be able to innovate and the answer to issues

there wouldn't be the threats not only to the u. s. but to israel and our allies because we would have the

we ought to be praying and hoping and fighting and getting out there and

I like to get out and help people

finally we need to open up the accreditation process and be able to allow people to get credit and ultimately degree based

hope there's some bipartisan desire to get to the truth here because they should be bipartisan desire to find out what happened to these people and

stood up and fought the world we went to the U. S. Supreme Court I argued the case twice before the U. S. Supreme Court defending on

when have you stood and fought actions speak far far we need to look to

need to get all of them will educate and we need to be able to look at the data that shows what is working and

all I we need to be pumping it out we need to be challenging the market places in Europe Asia and Africa we

grotesque and sickening in and that we should all be able to agree on that

want people to be able to to be to be confident and trust that that that that the person that that

to fund them because it wants to send the weapons to Baghdad who's not using it to defeat the terrorists and we and we notice on what we

white house the messages that we need to send people to Washington DC that will stand up to and offer the people of America and alter that's

we need to do everything we can to prosecute those individuals and to prevent them from getting firearms to be used in