decades fighting to defend the constitution and under the constitution marriage has always been a question for

you and to restore the constitution

show that and there is a constitutional means if someone wants to change the marriage laws in the state the way the constitution allows you to do so is

fellow citizens to go your state legislatures and change the marriage law that's the constitutional system what

would've been struck down three years ago and the marriage laws of all fifty states would be on

defend the constitution of the United States not one that undermines attacks and ignores the constitution of the United States Hardenbergh

two decades defending the US constitution under the constitution there are two ways to make binding law number

the courts uh granting uh the constitutional right to to drive marriage equality and

this down the throat of the American people and more importantly he's ignoring the constitution ignoring the congressional process I

and purported to strike down the Barrett law adopted in all fifty states exposed decisions were completely lawless that we're all marriage

hit publicly called for us to adopt a constitutional amendment to makes

the constitution Thomas Jefferson described the constitution as chains to bind the mischief of government and

the court's effectively striking down the marriage laws in thirty three states constitution makes clear marriage is a question for the states it's

this institution and of its constitutional my constitutional right constitutional obligation to ask relevant questions of public policy and

the law and the constitution grants them that right and to that i say a

is ignored the rule of law whether it was early in the administration where he said I