Sen. Marco Rubio - Why Abortion is bad for america

I think the one I wanna focus on tonight not because any more important the is there is pure and logical public policy reasons why

Abortion is bad for America bad for our society and why Roe versus Wade should be overturned

argument is that there is a fundamental right to abortion in the mail that is the argument those in the pro aborts so called pro choice can there's

never met anyone that's but to me that there they'll say the pro choice but almost everyone I've ever met has told me they personally disagree with the board they

just think it should be so that that's pretty indicative already starting point of what this issue really is about where is fundamental right from

two abortion coming you engage people that believe what they call abortion dances of the pregnancy the say what's an unwanted this

is a child that's going to enter life and not be wanted not be cared for parents don't want I'm perhaps there's a lot of unwanted children a

lot of punch unwanted children are born world that are because of it was then that would justify by and large somehow

all those unwanted children as well should be dealt but in a similar manner and that's a horrific conclude and so that cannot be the source of this right I

quickly move on from the argument because it's absurd and they don't want to think about when they say that to you that this is an unwise out and you say to the listen

there's a lot of unwanted children that are born all over this plan the orphan they're born to save born to families that can't afford them you

can't possibly be saying that those children should also be let and so they moved quickly away from that argument because it makes no sense and it's and spent

and the fact the most common argument that I hear the they could evidence to the argument of whether our Bob it's a woman's body and

your body is no doubt about it you do have a right to decide what to do with your body what others can do there's no doubt about it but

basically have are two rights that are in conflict is one of and we as a society must solve what do you do when

they mean by that directly in conflict with an unborn child's right to and the fundamental question for our societies how

do you resolve a conflict like that when two fundamental rights that everyone recognizes exit aren't

with one another and so immediately the other side will say what our right to choose is more important the right to and I'll say the reason why first

argument they almost always writer is because it's not a purse an embryo is not a person a fetus is not a it's not a person yet so

it's not a person and what is because if you left it alone that's the only thing I can become you can't develop indoor cats so

what if it's not if it has the DNA of a person certainly created by people and left to nature it will become a purse by

Nate but that's so it is a purse then I'll argue okay maybe it is a person but it's not a life so what you mean it's not a but

the person has a right to choose cannot live outside the that argument first and foremost is already a slippery slope because

viability is a moving target viability in nineteen seventy three mean something very different than what it means today my children

already got a slipper then they go on and say well the they're not viable without the support of them but that also can be a good because