%HESITATION those constitutional rights for law abiding as citizens that possess a firearms but also going after those

than going after the constitutional rights of law abiding Americans the president should be focused on

Obama Harry Reid led an assault I'm going after violent criminals which shouldn't but instead of going after the constitutional rights of law abiding citizen and

Obama administration doesn't do that instead they try to use these trad as an excuse to come after the constitutional rights of law abiding citizens it's unconstitutional it's

the most sensible in terms of balancing of the rights of law abiding citizens and

say let's go after violent criminals instead then just like now he went directly after the constitutional rights of law abiding citizens rather than solving the problem well

instead he used as an excuse to try to come after the second amendment rights of law abiding citizens not

he tried to use it as an excuse to go after the second amendment rights of law abiding citizens and everyone in Washington said it

question simply put is people use the phrase law abiding how do you know there are law abiding citizens if

have to ensure that the laws of people are putting out there do not infringe on the rights of of law abiding citizens and

been a law abiding citizen should have a right to own and bear guns commonly held in

I you know and %HESITATION I just think the law abiding citizens have that right you think its constitution as I do what

try to come after the second amendment rights of law abiding citizens not going to tell you in the weeks and months that followed sandy hook if

Americans of law abiding Americans to possess firearms via the second amendment which is a constitutional right no

into federal court giving them the same constitutional rights as an American citizen but

after the violent criminals come down on them like a ton of bricks but protect the constitutional rights of law abiding American nnj